The commercials that support the superficial (Grains)(English)-Inmortal Moral

Do the commercials support the superficial?

Surface commercial
CommercialDatos
Enlace: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvm4aLTohnc
Commercial 1: Con Asepxia y sin Asepxia- Emergencia
  1. Shows a victim of Bullying.
  2. They suffer because of their grains.
  3. To stop this you must use Asepxia.
  4. Because there are no grains, there is no Bullying.
Enlace: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WqnbDZZeMA
Commercial 2: Con Asepxia y sin Asepxia- Emergencia

  1. It is said that grain is not broken.
  2. Show what happens in the cases:
    1. When the product is used.
    2. When the product is not used.

Enlace: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raDcoXFLQ10
Commercial 3: Asepxia, apunta a los teenagers.

  1. They show a lot of natural methods.
  2. These methods make them look ineffective.
  3. They show the product, as the most reliable.

Answer: You can say yes, at a certain point.

Commercial 1:
1.1 Shows a victim of bullying.
It's not bad, since talking about the problem is good.

1.2 He suffers because of his grains.
It is justifying the bullying, saying that the real culprit is not the aggressors, but the victims for the grains.

1.3 To stop this you must use Asepxia.
They show the product as the savior that eliminates the problems.

1.4 Because there are no grains, there is no Bullying.
Let's say that the product eliminates the pimples, but that does not eliminate the problem of bullying.

The commercial suggests that the problem of bullying is resolved with Asepxia, blaming the victims for the grains they have. That's not right, the grain problem does not cause bullying, but the people themselves. Those evil people, who for reasons:

-Social class.
-For money.
-For fashion.
-By sexual orientation.
-For religious belief.
-Other

They are the true reasons for school bullying. Asepxia, does not eliminate that just by removing the grains, since that is a more complex issue.

Commercial 2:
2.1 It is said that grain is not broken.
This is true, not because the bacteria from the hands go to the hole created when squeezing the grain. What leads to infection and problems that leave marks on the skin, which makes it a more difficult problem.

2.2 Show what happens in the cases:
2.2.1 When the product is used.
2.2.2 When the product is not used.
What it gives has to understand that if you have grains, you are not interested in the girl. What leads to cross out the pimples, the guilty of getting a partner or friends, this we know is not true, as it motivates to discriminate against people by appearance.

This has happened before with people of color, Jews, homosexuals ... But now it is applicable to people with pimples. Like commercial 1, grains are not the problem.


Commercial 3:
3.1 Show a block of natural methods.
Showing alternate methods for the grain problem is good.

3.2 These methods make them look ineffective.
This shows it, as they do not work or are very slow for the problem. This may be true, but for the beans, you must have your time to resolve. Nothing is fast.

3.3 They show the product as the most reliable.
Reliable, yes. Many support the product, but nothing is better than the natural, mainly because many products have ingredients that many people can cause problems. This is a problem that is seen in many cases, not only with products for the face.

What did these commercials show us?

  1. The cause of bullying and problems of social relationships are the grains.
  2. The natural methods are ineffective.

Real solutions:

1.- Do not be a bastard with others.
2.- Consult the doctor for problems in the face and look for a solution, both natural and buy a product.
3.- Have a good diet, exercise, but still appear pimples for reasons such as stress, insomnia (sleeplessness), among other reasons.






    Comentarios